The Great Fire of London revisited

Peering through the mist of time.

Re: The Great Fire of London revisited

Postby spot » Thu Jul 01, 2010 8:42 am

lady cop wrote:a French Protestant watchmaker, Robert Hubert, confessed to having deliberately started the fire at the bakery with 23 conspirators.

Although his confession seemed to change and flounder under scrutiny, he was tried and hanged. Afterwards, colleagues told the inquiry Hubert had been at sea with them at the time, and the inquiry concluded the fire had indeed been an accident. No-one knows why he confessed.


The consequence of a court ruling that the fire was an act of war started by a foreign agent, rather than an act of God or negligence, released the funding required to rebuild the city. Liability was shifted from the tenants of all the destroyed properties, who had far less resource, to the landlords of the properties who were in general much wealthier. There was a great deal at stake in blaming a foreign arsonist.
User avatar
spot
 
Posts: 276
Joined: Sat Jun 26, 2010 10:34 am
Location: Blighty

Return to 24's History Chamber

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron